| SUBJECT | Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. |
|---|---|
| POSITION | Attorney General, Texas (2015–present) |
| INDICTED | July 28, 2015 · 3 felonies, Collin County |
| IMPEACHED | May 27, 2023 · House 121–23 |
| JUDGMENT | April 4, 2025 · $6.6M whistleblower |
| STATUS | GOP Senate nominee · runoff 63–37 over Cornyn, May 26 |
Before the indictments and impeachment, here's the biography. And the irony.
The Texas Attorney General is the state's chief legal officer. The office is responsible for representing Texas in litigation, enforcing consumer protection laws, combating human trafficking, protecting children, and ensuring government transparency through open records compliance.
In other words, the AG is Texas's top cop — the person the public trusts to uphold the rule of law. Since 2015, that person has been under felony indictment, reported to the FBI by his own senior staff, and impeached by his own party.
The people at the center of the Paxton saga. Every connection described below is documented in public records.
How Ken Paxton's legal troubles stack up, at a glance.
A chronological record of the proceedings. Click any entry to expand the case detail. Every line is sourced.
Before he was even sworn in, state regulators had flagged Paxton's investment activities. He had been soliciting investors for Servergy Inc., a technology company, without proper registration. The investigation would later lead to criminal charges.
Prosecutors alleged Paxton solicited investors to buy stock in Servergy Inc., a Dallas-area technology firm, without disclosing he would be compensated. He persuaded five investors to put $840,000 into Servergy in 2011, and a month later received 100,000 shares of stock. Paxton told SEC investigators the shares were a “gift,” not a commission. One of the complainants was Byron Cook, then a fellow Republican state representative.
Special prosecutors were appointed because local prosecutors had conflicts of interest. Years of disputes over how much these prosecutors should be paid stalled the case. The trial was moved between multiple counties. The delays meant Paxton served the better part of a decade as the state's top law enforcement officer while under pending felony indictment. No ordinary citizen would have had such leverage to delay their own trial.
The whistleblowers alleged Paxton used his authority to intervene in legal matters benefiting Nate Paul, an Austin real estate developer under FBI investigation who had donated to Paxton's campaign. Specific allegations included bribery, sharing confidential law enforcement information with Paul, and hiring an outside attorney to investigate Paul's adversaries using state resources. All eight whistleblowers were subsequently fired, placed on leave, or pushed out of the AG's office.
The lawsuit asked the Court to block the certification of election results in four states that President Biden won. SCOTUS rejected the case for lack of standing, with the Court finding Texas had not demonstrated a legally cognizable interest in how other states run their elections. The suit was criticized by legal scholars across the political spectrum. Some observers noted the suit was filed shortly after Paxton had allegedly sought a presidential pardon for his securities fraud charges.
Paxton appeared on stage at the rally preceding the Capitol breach and touted his failed legal effort to overturn the election. His wife, State Sen. Angela Paxton, also attended. After the attack, Paxton claimed without evidence that rioters were liberal activists posing as Trump supporters — a claim PolitiFact rated false. He was the only state AG to decline to condemn the attack and has refused to release his communications surrounding the event.
Four of the original eight whistleblowers sued under the Texas Whistleblower Act, alleging they were fired in retaliation for reporting Paxton to the FBI. Paxton tentatively settled for $3.3 million in Feb 2023 but needed legislative approval to pay with state funds. The Legislature's refusal to fund the settlement — with Republicans and Democrats balking — drew increased scrutiny that catalyzed the House impeachment investigation. In April 2025, Travis County District Judge Catherine Mauzy ruled the whistleblowers had proven their case and ordered the AG's office to pay $6.6 million. Paxton dropped the appeal in July 2025, locking in the taxpayer-funded payment.
The 121–23 vote included a large majority of Paxton's fellow Republicans. It made Paxton only the third sitting official in Texas history to be impeached. The House General Investigating Committee, led by Republicans, had conducted weeks of investigation before recommending impeachment. The 20 articles covered a sweeping range of allegations. Paxton was immediately suspended from office pending the Senate trial.
Conviction required a two-thirds supermajority. The Senate is more conservative than the House. No article reached the 21-vote threshold for conviction; the highest count was 14 votes. Angela Paxton's mandatory attendance created an extraordinary spectacle — she sat through testimony that included allegations of her husband's extramarital affair while unable to cast a vote. Paxton was reinstated as AG immediately following acquittal.
Under the pretrial diversion, Paxton was not required to enter a plea and did not admit guilt. His attorney stated there was “no admission of guilt because he is not guilty.” After nearly nine years of delays, the felony charges that had loomed over his entire tenure as AG were dismissed without trial. Legal experts noted that ordinary defendants facing first-degree felony securities fraud charges rarely receive such terms; pretrial diversion is more commonly offered for less serious cases.
The court filing states the couple stopped living together “on or about June 1, 2024.” Angela Paxton, who in 2023 sat through her husband's impeachment trial as a recused senator while witnesses testified about his extramarital affair, made the filing public via Twitter/X. The phrase “biblical grounds” in conservative Christian theology refers to infidelity — one of the few scripturally-cited reasons for divorce. Texas Monthly, the Texas Tribune, Newsweek, and Fox News all covered the filing.
Paxton is positioning himself as a “MAGA Warrior” alternative to the establishment-aligned Cornyn. His campaign has prompted scrutiny of his record — specifically the impeachment, indictments, and the whistleblower judgment — in ways that the 2022 AG re-election did not. Combined campaign and outside-group spending has exceeded $125 million, making it the most expensive U.S. primary in history.
The endorsement comes after months of speculation about whether Trump would weigh in. Polls before the endorsement showed the race within the margin of error (UH poll: Paxton 48%, Cornyn 45%). The endorsement is consistent with Trump's pattern of backing primary challengers to GOP incumbents he views as insufficiently loyal.
Final results: Paxton 63.4% / Cornyn 36.6% on roughly 903,000 votes cast. Cornyn became the first Texas senator since 1970 to lose to a same-party challenger. Pro-Cornyn forces outspent pro-Paxton forces approximately 9-to-1 overall and 3-to-1 during the runoff period itself; the Trump endorsement one week prior is broadly credited as decisive.
Paxton's victory statement: “Tonight, we just sent a Texas-sized message to Washington.” Cornyn's concession: “I fought the good fight. I finished the race, I kept the faith.”
Within minutes of the call, Cook Political Report moved the Texas Senate race from “Likely Republican” to “Lean Republican.” Paxton now faces Democrat James Talarico, an Austin state representative, in the general election on November 3, 2026.
The NRSC — the Senate GOP's official campaign arm — had published a sustained line of attack against Paxton during the runoff. Specific deleted items reported by CNN's KFile include the labels “Crooked Ken,” a digital ad titled “Ken Paxton Has a Dark Secret,” and a separate ad accusing Paxton of “Helping the Woke Left” by giving nearly $1 million to gender-affirming programs. The committee also removed accusations that Paxton had given favorable treatment to an alleged child sex trafficker.
Within hours of the Associated Press calling the race for Paxton on May 26, those press releases and ads disappeared from the NRSC site. Google's ad-transparency database, which archives served ads independently of the advertiser, was the receipt that made the deletions visible.
Talarico, an Austin state representative who won the Democratic primary on March 3 with 52.4% over Jasmine Crockett, had run his primary campaign on a relatively positive message. On May 27, the day after Paxton secured the Republican nomination, Talarico's general-election launch shifted to a corruption frame. Washington Post and Texas Tribune both reported the pivot: the campaign's new ads lead with Paxton's 2023 impeachment, his felony indictments, and the $6.6 million whistleblower judgment against the AG's office.
Per Talarico's framing, Paxton represents a political establishment that uses power to serve itself rather than the people. Per Paxton's countermessaging, Talarico is “the most extreme radical the Democrats have ever nominated.” The lines are drawn for the November 3 general.
Paxton's office had adopted rules requiring district and county attorneys representing populations of 400,000 or more to submit “initial, quarterly, and annual reports relating to criminal matters and the interests of the state.” The rules also required reporting on indictments against police officers and poll workers, case resolutions, and internal communications about how prosecutors make decisions. Non-compliance could be treated as “official misconduct” — a finding that can result in removal from office.
The counties that sued — Dallas, Harris, Travis, El Paso, Bexar, Fort Bend, and Williamson — are the state's largest and have mostly Democratic prosecutors. Judge Mauzy ruled May 7 that the rules were invalid and exceeded the AG's statutory authority. Paxton appealed on May 29 to the 15th Court of Appeals, the same court that had previously upheld Mauzy's temporary injunction in the same matter.
Angela Paxton filed for divorce on July 10, 2025, citing “biblical grounds” — a phrase that, in the conservative Christian tradition she and her husband publicly identify with, refers to infidelity. The court set the trial for June 24–26, 2026 in Collin County. It would have been a public proceeding.
On June 2, 2026 — one week after Paxton's GOP Senate runoff win — the parties' attorneys jointly told the court a trial setting was “no longer necessary,” stating that “the parties have made substantial progress toward an amicable resolution of all issues and remain engaged in productive discussions.” The cancellation removes from the calendar a public proceeding that would have featured testimony about the alleged extramarital affair referenced in the impeachment trial.
The Oval Office meeting was Paxton's first sit-down with the president since securing the nomination. Lt. Gov. Patrick attended; the White House framed the meeting as consolidating support and laying groundwork for fundraising in one of the most competitive Senate races of the 2026 midterms.
Paxton then went to Capitol Hill for a Senate Republican fundraiser. Among attendees: Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who had publicly supported John Cornyn in the runoff, and Sen. Ted Cruz. Leaving the event, Cruz told reporters he didn't yet have a number but was “confident it was substantial.” The unification picture comes one week after the NRSC quietly scrubbed its “Crooked Ken” attacks from the public record.
Talarico's campaign has run heavily on Paxton's record — the 2023 impeachment, the felony indictments, the $6.6M whistleblower judgment — framing him as corrupt and unfit for federal office. Cook Political Report rates the race “Lean Republican” as of May 27, 2026.
Each exhibit lays out the allegation, the evidence on file, and the disposition. Switch the tab to switch the file.
Paxton solicited investors to buy stock in Servergy Inc., a Dallas-area technology firm, without disclosing he would be compensated, and acted as an investment adviser without registering as required by Texas law.
A Collin County grand jury indicted Paxton on two first-degree felony securities fraud charges and one third-degree felony for failing to register as an investment adviser. Prosecutors said he persuaded five investors to put $840,000 into Servergy in 2011 and a month later received 100,000 shares of stock. One of the complainants was Byron Cook, then a fellow Republican state representative.
After nearly nine years of delays, the felony charges were dismissed in 2025 through a pretrial diversion agreement announced March 26, 2024 — 100 hours of community service, 15 hours of legal ethics courses, and approximately $271,000 in restitution. No plea was entered; no admission of guilt.
Paxton used the authority of the Attorney General's office to intervene in legal matters benefiting Nate Paul, an Austin real estate developer under FBI investigation who had donated to Paxton's campaign.
On Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2020, eight of Paxton's most senior staff — including First Assistant AG Jeff Mateer, multiple deputy AGs, and the Director of Law Enforcement — filed a criminal complaint with federal authorities. Specific allegations included bribery, sharing confidential law enforcement information with Paul, and hiring an outside attorney with state resources to investigate Paul's adversaries.
Paxton was not personally charged federally. Nate Paul was indicted in 2023 and pleaded guilty in January 2025 to making a false statement to a financial institution. The whistleblower allegations later became the foundation of the Texas House impeachment articles (Exhibit D).
The senior staff who reported Paxton to the FBI in 2020 were fired, placed on leave, or pushed out in retaliation, in violation of the Texas Whistleblower Act.
Four of the original eight whistleblowers sued under the Texas Whistleblower Act. In February 2023 Paxton tentatively agreed to a $3.3 million settlement but asked the Legislature to fund it; lawmakers refused, which directly catalyzed the House's impeachment investigation.
In April 2025, Travis County District Judge Catherine Mauzy ruled the whistleblowers had proven their case and ordered the AG's office to pay $6.6 million. Paxton dropped the appeal in July 2025, locking in the taxpayer-funded payment. Texas voters pay the bill.
The Texas House charged Paxton with 20 articles of impeachment covering bribery, abuse of office, obstruction of justice, dereliction of duty, and whistleblower retaliation.
The Republican-led House General Investigating Committee conducted weeks of hearings before recommending impeachment. On May 27, 2023 the House voted 121–23 to impeach — a majority of Paxton's fellow Republicans voted yes. He became only the third sitting Texas official ever impeached and was suspended from office.
The Texas Senate acquitted on September 16, 2023 — conviction required 21 of 30 eligible senators (Paxton's wife was required to attend but barred from voting), and no article reached the threshold; the highest vote against him was 14. Paxton was reinstated as AG the same day. Acquittal is not vindication.
Paxton used the legal authority of the Texas Attorney General to attempt to invalidate the certified election results of four other states, then publicly supported the effort to overturn the election at the January 6, 2021 rally near the U.S. Capitol.
In December 2020 Paxton filed an unprecedented original action at the U.S. Supreme Court — Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 22O155 — asking the Court to invalidate results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. On January 6, 2021 he spoke at the rally preceding the Capitol breach, telling the crowd “we will not quit fighting.” He was the only state AG to decline to condemn the attack.
SCOTUS rejected the suit for lack of standing. PolitiFact rated Paxton's claim that rioters were actually liberal activists false. He has refused to release his communications surrounding the rally and the breach.
Paxton, who publicly identifies as a conservative Christian and has built a political brand around “family values,” conducted an extramarital affair — allegations he is reported to have confessed privately to colleagues.
Witnesses testified during the 2023 impeachment trial that Paxton confessed an extramarital affair to colleagues in 2018. On July 10, 2025, State Senator Angela Paxton publicly filed for divorce after 38 years of marriage, citing “biblical grounds” — a phrase that in conservative Christian theology refers to infidelity, one of the few scripturally-cited reasons for divorce. The filing notes the couple stopped living together on or about June 1, 2024.
Divorce proceedings are ongoing. Angela Paxton's public statement on X drew coverage from Texas Monthly, Texas Tribune, Newsweek, Fox News, and CNN.
The Office of the Attorney General — the office responsible for enforcing the Texas Public Information Act — has resisted transparency about its own conduct, while Texas taxpayers absorb the cost of the resulting investigations and judgments.
Texas news organizations have documented slow responses, broad exemption claims, and refusals to produce communications related to the January 6 rally and the Nate Paul matter. Separately, Texas taxpayers are on the hook for the $6.6M whistleblower judgment (Exhibit C) plus millions in impeachment-related costs.
Ongoing. Multiple FOIA disputes remain unresolved, and the AG's office faces routine criticism in editorial pages across the state's largest papers.
May 27, 2023 — the Texas House of Representatives, HR 2377 (RV#2191). Every one of the 149 members is on the floor below. Hover, click, or search by name.
A side-by-side look at how the justice system treated Texas's top law enforcement officer compared to ordinary citizens facing similar charges.
An itemized statement for costs incurred by the State of Texas while defending the Attorney General. Reading copy — the underlying figures are from court orders and legislative records.
| Line | Description | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 001 |
Whistleblower Act judgment
Court-ordered payment to four senior aides who were fired after reporting Paxton to the FBI. Paxton dropped the appeal in July 2025, locking in the taxpayer-funded payment.
Travis County District Court · April 2025
|
$6,600,000final judgment |
| 002 |
House investigation + Senate trial
Legal counsel, witness expenses, administrative costs, and lost legislative time. Precise figures are still being tallied by the Texas Legislative Council.
Texas Legislature records · 88th Leg.
|
Multi-mil.pending audit |
| 003 |
Securities fraud prosecution — nine-year run
Years of special prosecutor fees, venue dispute litigation, and administrative costs. Includes the $271,000 in restitution Paxton himself paid under the diversion deal.
Texas court records · special prosecutor fee filings
|
Years of fees+ $271K restitution |
The $6.6 million whistleblower judgment alone could have funded substantial public services across Texas — college scholarships, food bank operations, additional prosecutors to fight actual crime, or victim services. Instead, taxpayers are footing the bill because a court found the AG's office retaliated against the senior staff who reported him to the FBI.
Seven statements of the case, drawn from court filings, legislative records, federal pleadings, and the May 26, 2026 GOP runoff. Page through the excerpts.
An objective examination on the public record. Seven questions. All answers are sourced from court records, legislative proceedings, or major news outlets. Pass = 5 of 7.
Common questions, deposed under the public record. Click any question to see the witness’s answer.
Documented information, public records, or leads worth investigating. We do not log IP addresses. Stay anonymous if you wish — submissions are stored without your IP, browser fingerprint, or location.